Pacritinib vs. Hydroxyurea for Advanced Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
This study is looking at whether pacritinib works better than hydroxyurea to treat advanced proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), a type of blood cancer. Researchers want to see if pacritinib is more effective and has fewer side effects. You might be able to join if you are an adult with CMML-1, have a high white blood cell count, and advanced disease (like an enlarged spleen). The study will measure success by looking at improvements in your red blood cells, platelets, and neutrophils (types of blood cells) without the leukemia getting worse. The study status is unclear, and it plans to enroll about 66 participants.
- Study design
- This is an open-label, randomized Phase 2 study where about 66 participants will be assigned to receive either pacritinib or hydroxyurea. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio, meaning more people will receive pacritinib.
- What's involved
- You would go through a 28-day screening period, receive treatment for up to 48 weeks, and then have a 30-day follow-up after treatment ends.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- After treatment ends, participants will be followed for up to one year to monitor their health and survival.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Pacritinib vs. Hydroxyurea in Advanced Proliferative Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
At a glance
Conditions
NCT07033598
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 6 sites. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust
London, Greater London, United Kingdomstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesotastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texasstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Floridastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
The Christie, NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdomstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Winship Cancer Institute at Emory
Atlanta, Georgiastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Clinical benefit at Week 24, defined as achieving erythroid response in the absence of leukemic transformation.Measured from Week 24 through the end of treatment, up to 48 weeks.
For participants with baseline hemoglobin \<10 g/dL, response is defined as either a ≥1.5 g/dL hemoglobin increase lasting ≥8 weeks without red blood cell transfusion, or, if transfusion-dependent at baseline (≥4 units in the 8 weeks pre-enrollment), achieving ≥8 weeks of red blood cell transfusion independence, excluding transfusions given for pretreatment Hb ≤8.5 g/dL. Leukemic transformation is defined as ≥20% blasts or blast equivalents in the peripheral blood or bone marrow biopsy, or development of granulocytic sarcoma.
- Clinical benefit at Week 24, defined as achieving platelet response in the absence of leukemic transformation.Measured from Week 24 through the end of treatment, up to 48 weeks.
For participants with baseline platelet counts \<100 × 10⁹/L, response is defined as one of the following: an increase to ≥20 × 10⁹/L and by ≥100% for ≥8 weeks without platelet transfusion (if baseline \<20 × 10⁹/L); an increase of ≥30 × 10⁹/L for ≥8 weeks without transfusion (if baseline 20-\<100 × 10⁹/L); or, if transfusion-dependent at baseline (≥4 units in the 8 weeks pre-enrollment), achieving ≥8 weeks of platelet transfusion independence. Leukemic transformation is defined as ≥20% blasts or blast equivalents in the peripheral blood or bone marrow biopsy, or development of granulocytic sarcoma.
- Clinical benefit at Week 24, defined as achieving neutrophil response in the absence of leukemic transformation.Measured from Week 24 through the end of treatment, up to 48 weeks.
For participants with baseline ANC ≤1 × 10⁹/L, response is defined as either an increase to \>0.5 × 10⁹/L and by ≥100% for ≥8 weeks without myeloid growth factors (if baseline ANC ≤0.5 × 10⁹/L), or an increase by ≥50% for ≥8 weeks without myeloid growth factors (if baseline ANC \>0.5 to ≤1 × 10⁹/L). Leukemic transformation is defined as ≥20% blasts or blast equivalents in the peripheral blood or bone marrow biopsy, or development of granulocytic sarcoma.
- Clinical benefit at Week 24, defined as achieving spleen response in the absence of leukemic transformation.Measured from Week 24 through the end of treatment, up to 48 weeks.
For participants with baseline spleen ≥5 cm below the left costal margin (midclavicular line), spleen response is defined as a ≥35% reduction in spleen volume at endpoint assessment by MRI or CT. Leukemic transformation is defined as ≥20% blasts or blast equivalents in the peripheral blood or bone marrow biopsy, or development of granulocytic sarcoma.
- Clinical benefit at Week 24, defined as achieving symptom response in the absence of leukemic transformation.Measured from Week 24 through the end of treatment, up to 48 weeks.
Among participants with baseline Total Symptom Score (TSS) ≥20 per the MPN-SAF TSS: achieving ≥50% TSS reduction from baseline at the time of endpoint assessment. Leukemic transformation is defined as ≥20% blasts or blast equivalents in the peripheral blood or bone marrow biopsy, or development of granulocytic sarcoma.