EVD Placement Using Augmented Reality or Image-Based Localization
This study is for adults who need an external ventricular drain (EVD) due to a brain bleed (intracerebral hemorrhage with intraventricular hemorrhage) or a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). An EVD is a small tube placed in the brain to drain fluid. Researchers want to see if using augmented reality (AR) to guide EVD placement is as safe and effective as using standard image-guidance systems. You might be eligible if you are an adult with one of these conditions and have certain signs on your brain imaging, like tissue swelling or a shift in brain structures. The main goal is to compare how successfully the EVD is placed and if there are any complications during the procedure.
- Study design
- This study plans to enroll 50 adult participants. It is an interventional study comparing two different methods for EVD placement.
- What's involved
- You would undergo an EVD placement procedure, where either an image-guidance system or an augmented reality system will be used to assist the operator.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The primary outcomes, successful EVD placement and complication rates, are measured during the procedure itself.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Placing External Ventricular Drains Using Assistive Augmented Reality or Image-Based Localization
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesWho to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Successful EVD catheter placementDuring procedure
Post-procedural non-contrast head CT will be reviewed by masked assessor to evaluate success of EVD placement per the Kakarla grading system. This grading system classifies catheter positioning into three grades based on postoperative imaging. Grade 1 indicates optimal placement in the ipsilateral frontal horn or third ventricle for effective drainage. Grade 2 represents functional but non-ideal placement in the contralateral ventricle or non-eloquent cortex. Grade 3 denotes suboptimal placement in eloquent cortex or non-target spaces, potentially leading to complications. Thus, a higher score means a worse outcome.
- rate of complication during placementDuring procedure