The T1D Talks Pilot Study
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Rachel Wasserman, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School Of Medicine
Who to contact
This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Percent of participants who attended the interventionThrough study completion, up to 12 weeks
Feasibility will be demonstrated by average individual participation in at least 70% of the sessions, and \>70% of participants completing the intervention by participating in the last session.
- Percent of participants who rated each session as acceptableThrough study completion, up to 12 weeks
The percentage of participants who rated each session as "acceptable" on a post-session survey rating scales that were developed for this study. 6 items on the session evaluation survey assess the following: relevance, trust in the information, ease of understanding, learning novel information, and interest in topics. Item responses include a 5-point Likert scale from "strongly disagree to strongly agree". The research team will average participant's responses across the items, thus total score could be a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 5, with a higher score indicating higher acceptability of the intervention. The intervention will be considered acceptable if ≥ 70% of participants rate each session as acceptable, as indicated by a total score \>3.
- Percent of participants who rated the overall intervention as acceptableThrough study completion, up to 12 weeks
The percentage of participants who rated the intervention, as a whole, as "acceptable" on a post-intervention survey rating scales that were developed for this study. 16 items on the intervention evaluation survey assess, one's perceptions of the intervention. Item responses include a 5-point Likert scale from "strongly disagree to strongly agree". The research team will reverse score items that negatively worded and average participant's responses across the items, thus total score could be a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 5, with a higher score indicating higher acceptability of the intervention. The intervention will be considered acceptable if ≥ 70% of participants rate the intervention as acceptable, as indicated by a total score \>3.