Varenicline and Accelerated TMS for Quitting Nicotine Use
This study is looking at whether a combination of varenicline (an FDA-approved medication) and accelerated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (aTMS), which uses magnetic pulses to stimulate brain cells, can help adults quit smoking or vaping nicotine. Researchers want to see if receiving active aTMS plus varenicline leads to higher rates of quitting nicotine and lower cravings, compared to a placebo (inactive) aTMS with varenicline. You could be eligible if you are 18-65 years old, speak English, want to quit nicotine in the next month, and have nicotine dependence. The study will measure if you can stay nicotine-free for weeks 9-12 of the study.
- Study design
- This is a randomized, double-blind study with 30 participants. You will be assigned to one of two groups: active aTMS or sham (inactive) aTMS, both combined with varenicline.
- What's involved
- You will complete two brain MRI scans, take varenicline daily for 12 weeks, and complete one day of up to 20 TMS treatments. You will also receive 12 sessions of nicotine cessation counseling and take a single dose of D-cycloserine or a placebo pill.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The study measures your nicotine abstinence between weeks 9 and 12, and brain activity at baseline and week 12.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Varenicline and Accelerated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for Quitting Nicotine Use (Pilot Study)
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Jodi M Gilman, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Massachusetts General Hospital
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Biochemically-confirmed continuous nicotine abstinence across study weeks 9-12Week 9-Week 12
Point-prevalence abstinence from e-cigarette use was defined as self-report of no e-cigarette use since the last visit, bioverified by saliva cotinine \<30 ng/ml. Continuous abstinence is defined as observed point-prevalence abstinence over specified study visits at weeks 9, 10, 11 and 12. The primary analysis will compare the proportion of participants achieving continuous abstinence in the enhanced aTMS + varenicline group versus the Sham + varenicline group using a chi-square test. If expected cell counts are low (\<5 in any cell), Fisher's exact test will be used instead.
- Resting State Functional Connectivity (rsFC)Baseline, Week 12
Within-network resting state Functional Connectivity (rsFC) will be computed by extracting the mean BOLD time series from each region of interest comprising the addiction circuit and calculating pairwise Pearson correlations, which will then be Fisher z-transformed and averaged across all ROI pairs to derive a single within-network rsFC metric per participant at each time point. To isolate effects at the circuit level rather than changes induced by stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) target site itself, the mPFC stimulation region will be excluded from the connectivity analyses. The primary analytic approach will use a linear mixed-effects model with fixed effects for time (baseline vs. post-treatment), treatment group (TMS vs. sham TMS), and their interaction, as well as a random intercept for each participant.
- Change in Insula Activation to Nicotine Cues During a Cue Reactivity Task Measured by fMRIBaseline, Week 12
Neural responses to nicotine and neutral cues will be modeled, convolved with the canonical hemodynamic response function, and contrast images for nicotine \> neutral cues will be generated for each participant at each time point. These contrast images will be entered into second-level analyses to test group-level effects. The primary region of interest (ROI) will be the bilateral anterior insula, defined using an anatomical mask from the Harvard-Oxford atlas. The main analytic model will be a mixed-effects repeated-measures ANOVA or linear mixed-effects model with fixed effects of time (pre vs. post), treatment group (TMS + varenicline vs. sham TMS + varenicline), and their interaction, with subject-level random intercepts. The key test of our hypothesis is the time × treatment interaction within the anterior insula ROI, which reflects whether treatment modulates cue-elicited insula activity.