Cognitive Remediation for Postviral Neurocognitive Dysfunction
This study is testing if a computerized "brain training" program called NeuroFlex can help older adults who have memory or thinking problems (neurocognitive dysfunction) after a viral infection like COVID-19. Participants will either use NeuroFlex, which trains basic processing and executive functions, or play other computer games that don't focus on these skills. The researchers want to see if NeuroFlex improves thinking abilities and daily functioning, and if these benefits last over time. They will measure changes in set-shifting abilities (how easily you can switch between tasks) and how easy the NeuroFlex program is to use. You might be able to join if you are 60 or older, had a confirmed COVID-19 infection, and have had cognitive symptoms for at least 12 weeks. The current status of this study is unclear.
- Study design
- This is a randomized study with two groups, planning to enroll 75 participants. Participants will be assigned to either the NeuroFlex program or an active control group.
- What's involved
- Participants will engage in a 6-week course of either computerized cognitive remediation or computer-based control activities. Measurements will be taken before treatment, after treatment (Week 7), and at 6 months.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be followed for 6 months after treatment to see if effects are maintained.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Cognitive Remediation
At a glance
Conditions
NCT07171450
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
UConn Health
Farmington, Connecticutno site contact published
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Cutter Lindbergh, Ph.D. · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · UConn Health
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Group Difference in Set-Shifting Abilities at Post-Treatment as Measured with Trails BPre-treatment and post-treatment (Week 7)
Part B of the Trail Making Test (Trails B) is an executive functioning measure of set-shifting abilities in which the examinee must rapidly alternate between connecting numbers and letters distributed across a page. The total time (in seconds) required for the examinee to complete the task is recorded. Lower scores (in seconds) indicate better performance. Time to complete Trails B at the post-treatment visit will be compared between treatment groups (i.e., NeuroFlex vs. Active Control Condition), controlling for pre-treatment Trails B performance.
- Group Difference in Set-Shifting Abilities at 6 Months as Measured with Trails BPre-treatment and 6 Months
Part B of the Trail Making Test (Trails B) is an executive functioning measure of set-shifting abilities in which the examinee must rapidly alternate between connecting numbers and letters distributed across a page. The total time (in seconds) required for the examinee to complete the task is recorded. Lower scores (in seconds) indicate better performance. Time to complete Trails B at the 6-month visit will be compared between treatment groups (i.e., NeuroFlex vs. Active Control Condition), controlling for pre-treatment Trails B performance.
- User Experience/Interface with Computerized Cognitive Remediation Program at Post-Treatment as Measured with the System Usability ScalePost-Treatment (Week 7)
The System Usability Scale is a well-validated, 10-item, self-report questionnaire of user experience/interface (UX/ UI) with computer-based programs. Participants rate each item using a 5-point Likert-style scale with response options ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree". Total scores ranging from 0-100 are calculated using a standard equation. Higher total scores indicate better UX/UI.