PRAISE With Coaching Program for Aggression and Bullying Prevention

This study is looking at how well the PReventing Aggression In Schools Everyday (PRAISE) program works to reduce aggression and bullying in children. The PRAISE program is taught in classrooms and helps 3rd to 5th graders learn skills like understanding feelings, calming down, and responding to conflicts in positive ways. It also teaches empathy and how to be a helpful bystander. We are testing a version of PRAISE where school staff are trained and coached to lead the program. We want to see if this adapted program can reduce aggression and bullying and improve social problem-solving skills. Children aged 8 and older who are in 3rd-5th grade at participating schools can join. The study aims to enroll 1008 participants.

Study design
This is an interventional study involving 1008 participants in 3rd-5th grade classrooms. It uses a randomized control trial design across at least 8 elementary schools.
What's involved
Not specified in the trial record.
Compensation
Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up
Participants will be assessed at the beginning of the study and again approximately 8 months after the intervention.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

NCT07191782

Examining the Efficacy of the PRAISE With Coaching Program

Recruiting
NAAges 8+InterventionalPrevention
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
~1,008 participants
Updated 2026-07-22 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Universal, classroom-based, Bullying and Aggression Prevention Program

At a glance

Recruiting sites
1 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Knowledge of Social Information Processing
Measured over At baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.
+5 more outcomes measured
Aggression Childhood
Bullying Victimization
Social Behavior

NCT07191782

Where you'd take part

This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvaniastudy coordinator listed

    Recruiting

Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.

  • Tracy E Waasdorp, PhD MSEd · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • Brooke S Paskewich, Psy.D · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.

Want this trial checked against your situation?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Enrolled in one of the participating school sites
In a 3rd-5th grade classroom participating in the study
Employed by one of the participating school sites
Teach and/or provide services to students in 3rd-5th grade

Exclusion

Do not speak English
Special education students not integrated in a regular education classroom
Student not in Grades 3-5 at the participating school sites
Do not speak English
Do not teach/provide services with 3rd-5th grade students at the participating school sites
  • Knowledge of Social Information ProcessingAt baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

    Student self-report of social information processing knowledge will be gathered using the Knowledge of Anger Problem Solving measure (9 items) where items are scored a 1 if correct and 0 if incorrect and summed (Range: 0-9), higher scores reflect better social information processing

  • Hostile AttributionsAt baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

    Student self-report of hostile attributions will be assessed using the Cartoon-Based Hostile Attributional Bias measure, with 2 relational vignettes and 2 physical vignettes, with one question asking whether a behavior was intentional or unintentional. Each vignette has a range of 0 (no bias) to 4 (strong bias). Scores on the 2 items per vignette type (relational, physical) are summed where higher scores reflect a worse outcome.

  • Reactive/proactive AggressionAt baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

    Measured via student self-report using items drawn from the Peer Conflict Scale -Youth Version measure, the proactive relational (6 items) and reactive relational (6 items) and overt (5 items). Items, with a range of 1-Not at all true to 4-Definitely true, will be averaged per scale. Higher scores indicate more proactive relational, reactive relational and reactive overt aggression.

  • CyberbullyingAt baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

    Student Self-report on items drawn from the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire will assess two scales: cyberbullying perpetration (7 items) and victimization (7 items) with answers ranging from 1-Never to 5-A few times a week. Items will be averaged such that higher score is more perpetration or victimization experiences.

  • Bystander BehaviorsAt baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

    Self-report of positive bystander behaviors will be assessed using 5 items drawn from the Maryland Safe and Supportive Schools (MDS3) Climate Survey with answers ranging from 1-Never to 5-All the time. Items are averaged with higher scores indicating more use of positive bystander behaviors.

  • Relational and Overt AggressionAt baseline and post intervention, approximately 8 months.

    Using teacher report on each child in their classroom, the Children's Social Behavior Questionnaire will assess a child's relational (7 items) and overt (4 items) aggression with a range of 1-Never true to 5-Almost always true. Items are averaged per scale with higher scores indicating more relational or overt aggression.