Electronic Surveys to Connect Advanced Cancer Patients to Palliative Care

This study is exploring if electronic surveys (ePROs) can help patients with advanced cancer better report their symptoms and needs, leading to earlier connection with palliative care services. Palliative care is specialized support that helps improve comfort and quality of life by addressing symptoms like pain and fatigue. The study compares two approaches: one where weekly ePROs and monthly palliative care surveys directly guide referrals, and another where weekly ePROs are used alongside standard palliative care referral practices. We are looking for about 90 participants aged 18 or older with unresectable or metastatic thoracic, gastrointestinal, or breast solid tumors who are currently receiving cancer treatment. The main goal is to see if these methods are practical and effective over 12 and 24 weeks.

Study design
This interventional study plans to enroll about 90 participants. It compares two different ways of using electronic surveys to connect patients to palliative care.
What's involved
Participants will complete weekly electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) symptom surveys. Some will also complete a monthly palliative care-focused survey.
Compensation
Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up
The study will measure feasibility of the intervention and trial methods at 12 and 24 weeks.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

NCT07195513

Electronic Patient Reporting of Symptoms and Unmet Needs to Connect Patients With Advanced Cancer to Palliative Care Services

Recruiting
NAAges 18+InterventionalSupportive care
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
~90 participants
Updated 2026-03-10 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:ePRO-Directed Referral and Navigation to Palliative/Supportive CareePRO Symptom Monitoring with Usual Palliative Care Referral

At a glance

Recruiting sites
1 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Feasibility of the Intervention & Trial Methods
Measured over 12 and 24 weeks
Palliative Care Referral
Advanced Cancer
Palliative Care, Health Services
Metastatic Cancer (Different Solid Tumour Types)
1 sites across 1 states
New Hampshire1
  • Tara L. Kaufmann, MD, MSCE · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.

  • Feasibility of the Intervention & Trial Methods12 and 24 weeks

    Feasibility will be assessed as a composite of three prespecified components, each summarized as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals: Enrollment: Proportion of eligible patients who provide informed consent and are randomized. Retention: Proportion of randomized patients who complete the FACT-G at 12 weeks \[primary feasibility outcome\] and 24 weeks. Intervention Compliance: Weekly ePRO symptom surveys: Longitudinal compliance quantified as the proportion of participants who self-report at least once in each week of enrollment, averaged over the observation period. Monthly palliative-care ePRO surveys (intervention arm): Longitudinal compliance quantified as the proportion of participants who self-report at least once in each month of enrollment, averaged over the observation period.