Pilot Study for Improving Outcomes in Youth with Type 2 Diabetes

This study is looking at different ways to help young people (ages 13-22) with type 2 diabetes and their families. It focuses on addressing health-related social needs (HRSN), which are things like access to food, housing, and transportation that can affect health. The study will test several approaches: providing tailored resources based on specific needs, offering universal resources to everyone, sending supportive text messages, and connecting families with Community Health Workers (CHW) who can help find resources. The main goal is to see how practical and well-received these strategies are. You would attend regular clinic visits and complete surveys and interviews.

Study design
This interventional study plans to enroll 104 participants. It is a pilot study, meaning it's testing new approaches to see how well they work.
What's involved
Participants will attend regularly scheduled diabetes clinic visits and complete surveys and interviews. They will also be connected to community resources.
Compensation
Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up
Acceptability of interventions will be measured at baseline, 1-week after baseline, and 3 months.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

NCT07216118

Pilot-Testing Strategies to Improve Outcomes for Youth With Type 2 Diabetes by Addressing Health-Related Social Needs

Recruiting
NAAges 13+InterventionalHealth services
University of Pittsburgh
~104 participants
Updated 2026-04-27 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Tailored ResourcesUniversal EmpowermentText MessagesCommunity Health Workers (CHW)

At a glance

Recruiting sites
1 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Acceptability of Intervention: Health-Related Social Needs Screener
Measured over at baseline clinic visit
+5 more outcomes measured
Diabetes in Adolescence
Type 2 Diabetes
Social Needs
1 sites across 1 states
Pennsylvania1
  • Mary Ellen Vajravelu, MD MSHP · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Pittsburgh
  • Maya I Ragavan, MD MPH MS · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Pittsburgh

Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Age 13 to 22 years old
known diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
followed clinically at UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
able to provide assent/consent
Adult (18 years or older) identifying as a primary caretaker of an adolescent or young adult with type 2 diabetes
Has an adolescent/young adult who agrees to participate in the study
able to provide consent

Exclusion

Inability to complete study questionnaires in English
  • Acceptability of Intervention: Health-Related Social Needs Screenerat baseline clinic visit

    4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure; completed by all adolescents and caregivers. Questions are specific to acceptability of the screening questionnaire used to assess health-related social needs, with responses ranging from completely disagree to completely agree (5-point scale). A mean of 4 or higher indicates acceptability.

  • Acceptability of Intervention: Tailored Approach to Address Health-Related Social Needs1-week after baseline; 3 months

    4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure; completed by adolescents and caregivers assigned to arms using a tailored approach (not universal empowerment). Questions are specific to acceptability of the tailored approach used to address health-related social needs, with responses ranging from completely disagree to completely agree (5-point scale). A mean of 4 or higher indicates acceptability.

  • Acceptability of Intervention: Universal Empowerment Approach to Address Health-Related Social Needsat baseline visit; 1-week after baseline; 3 months

    4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure; completed by adolescents and caregivers assigned to arms using a universal empowerment approach (not tailored approach). Questions are specific to acceptability of the universal empowerment approach used to address health-related social needs, with responses ranging from completely disagree to completely agree (5-point scale). A mean of 4 or higher indicates acceptability.

  • Acceptability of Intervention: Text Messages to Address Health-Related Social Needs3 months

    4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure; completed by adolescents and caregivers assigned to arms using text messages without community health workers to support resource connection. Questions are specific to acceptability of the text messages without community health worker approach used to address health-related social needs, with responses ranging from completely disagree to completely agree (5-point scale). A mean of 4 or higher indicates acceptability.

  • Acceptability of Intervention: Community Health Workers to Address Health-Related Social Needs3 months

    4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure; completed by adolescents and caregivers assigned to arms using text messages with community health workers to support resource connection. Questions are specific to acceptability of community health workers in addition to text messages to address health-related social needs, with responses ranging from completely disagree to completely agree (5-point scale). A mean of 4 or higher indicates acceptability.

  • Fidelity of Intervention1-week after baseline; 3 months; 6 months

    Investigator developed survey around receipt of intervention components including resources requested and used, community health worker interactions, and text message receipt; completed by adolescents and caregivers in all arms. Frequency and types of resources used, as well as community organizations with which respondents interacted will be reported. Frequency and duration of contact with community health workers will be reported for those assigned to arms using community health workers.