Improving HIV Prevention and Substance Use Post-Sexual Assault Services
This study aims to improve services for young people (ages 17-25) who have experienced sexual assault, focusing on preventing HIV and addressing substance use. Researchers are testing an "enhanced intervention" that includes better access to sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) services, same-day access to nPEP (non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis, a medicine to prevent HIV after possible exposure) and DoxyPEP (doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis, a medicine to prevent certain sexually transmitted infections), and substance use screening. This enhanced care is compared to "usual care," which is the typical SANE services. The main goal of this initial study is to see how easy it is to recruit and enroll eligible participants, and how quickly they can be enrolled. The study is currently unclear about its status, but plans to enroll 90 participants.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study comparing an enhanced intervention to usual care. It plans to enroll 90 participants.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The primary endpoints for recruitment feasibility are measured at the end of the study, one month after baseline.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Improving HIV Prevention and Substance Use Post-Sexual Assault Services
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Diane M Santa Maria, DrPH,MSN,FAANRN,PHNA-BC,FSAHM · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Recruitment feasibility as measured by percentage of eligible individuals screenedend of study (1 month after baseline)
- Recruitment feasibility as measured by percentage of eligible individuals enrolledend of study (1 month after baseline)
- Recruitment feasibility as measured by time delay from screening to enrollmentend of study (1 month after baseline)
- Recruitment feasibility as measured by time to enroll sufficient sample sizeend of study (1 month after baseline)
- Recruitment feasibility as measured by percentage loss to exclusion criteria.end of study (1 month after baseline)
- Randomization strategies as measured by proportion randomized to intervention and controlend of study (1 month after baseline)
- Retention as measured by the number of participants that completed the one month follow-up surveyend of study (1 month after baseline)
- Retention of the intervention group as measured by the number of participants that completed the one month follow-up surveyend of study (1 month after baseline)
- Retention of the control group as measured by the number of participants that completed the one month follow-up surveyend of study (1 month after baseline)
- Adherence to intervention as measured by percentage of content completed in the fidelity checklistend of study (1 month after baseline)
- Acceptability as measured by percentage of data lossend of study (1 month after baseline)
- Acceptability as measured by score on the credibility/expectancy questionnaireend of study (1 month after baseline)
The Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) was used to assess the acceptability of the intervention. All participants completed both subscales: the credibility subscale and the expectancy subscale. Each subscale total score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater perceived acceptability. The expectancy subscale is reported.
- Acceptability as measured by score on the credibility/expectancy questionnaireend of study (1 month after baseline)
The Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) was used to assess the acceptability of the intervention. All participants completed both subscales: the credibility subscale and the expectancy subscale. Each subscale total score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater perceived acceptability. The credibility subscale is reported.