Improving Information Sharing for Home Care of Older Adults

This study is testing a guide called GRACE (Guide for Role Awareness and Care Engagement) to help family caregivers and home care aides better share information and understand their roles when caring for older adults. You might be able to join if you are a home care aide or a family caregiver, are at least 18 years old, and speak English. The study aims to see if GRACE is easy to use and helpful (acceptability and feasibility). Researchers will also look at how it affects social engagement of older adults. The study plans to enroll 100 participants, but its current status is unclear.

Study design
This interventional study plans to enroll 100 participants, involving up to 50 family caregiver-home care aide pairs.
What's involved
You would receive the GRACE guide and provide information about your experiences at enrollment, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.
Compensation
Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up
Information will be collected at enrollment, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after the intervention.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

NCT07227558

Improving Information Sharing Between Family Caregivers and Home Care Aides

Recruiting
NAAges 18+InterventionalHealth services
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
~100 participants
Updated 2026-08-12 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:GRACE

At a glance

Recruiting sites
1 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Acceptability as assessed by survey
Measured over 2 week and 4 weeks
+9 more outcomes measured
Shared Care

NCT07227558

Where you'd take part

This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.

  • Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Marylandno site contact published

    Recruiting

Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.

  • Chanee Fabius, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health

Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.

Want this trial checked against your situation?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

English speaking,
home care aides, personal care aides, or personal care aides, providing services to older adults with ADRD. 2. Family or unpaid caregiver eligible for the study if:
18 years and older
English speaking
hear well enough to communicate by telephone
identify themselves as the primary family member or unpaid (friend/companion) caregiver

Exclusion

non-English speaking
certified nursing assistants, nursing assistant, home health aides, or medication technicians. 2. Family/unpaid caregivers ineligible if:
less than 18 years old
non-English speaking
do not hear well enough to communicate by telephone
two or more incorrect answers or not being able to respond to a validated 6-item telephone screening instrument
are not identified as the person's primary caregiver, or are paid for services.
  • Acceptability as assessed by survey2 week and 4 weeks

    Participants will be asked to rate their overall feedback of the role and preference guide. Participants will be asked how often they used the guide since the last study time point using a scale from 1 to 5 (1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Occasionally, 4= Often, 5 Constantly) where higher scores indicate greater frequency of use.

  • Feasibility as assessed by survey2 week and 4 weeks

    Participants will be asked about how helpful the guide was using a scale from 1 to 5:1=Not helpful at all, 2=Not too helpful, 3=Somewhat helpful, 4=Pretty helpful, 5=Very helpful, where higher scores indicate more helpful. More affirmative responses indicate better feasibility of the guide.

  • Low Social Engagement as assessed by survey questionBaseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

    Low social engagement measures an older adult's ability to participate in social activities of longstanding interest reported by the caregiver. This item is measured on a scale from 0-3 (0=Occurred in the last 3 days, 1=Occurred within the last week, 2=Occurred within the last month, 3=Last occurred more than one month ago) where higher scores mean lesser ability to participate in social activities.

  • Caregiver is Overwhelmed as assessed by survey questionBaseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

    Caregivers' feelings of being overwhelmed measures how often a caregiver is overwhelmed by aspects of caregiving responsibilities and older adults' illness. This item is measured using a scale from 1-5 (1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Occasionally, 4=Often, 5= Constantly) where higher scores mean greater feelings of being overwhelmed.

  • Caregiver Distress assessed by survey questionBaseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

    Caregivers' feelings of distress measures how often a caregiver is distressed by aspects of caregiving responsibilities and older adults' illness. This item is measured using a scale from 1-5 (1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Occasionally, 4=Often, 5= Constantly) where higher scores mean greater feelings of distress.

  • Caregiver Continuity assessed by survey itemBaseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

    Caregivers continuity measures how feelings on inability to continue caregiving. This item is measured using a scale from 1-5 (1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Occasionally, 4=Often, 5= Constantly) where higher scores mean greater feelings of distress.

  • Caregiver Preparedness assessed by The Caregiving Preparedness Scale (CPS)Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

    The Caregiving Preparedness Scale (CPS) is an 8-item uni-dimensional instrument that evaluates the extent to which a caregiver and direct care worker feels prepared to meet the psychological and physical needs of a patient (client). The scale was originally developed for family caregivers and has been used to assess caregiver preparedness in direct care workers in prior work. Responses are categorized with a 5-level likert scale: Not at all prepared; not too prepared; somewhat well prepared; pretty well prepared; very well prepared. The total scale score, which is a mean of all items scores, ranges between 0 and 4 with higher score indicating better preparedness.

  • Relational Coordination assessed by surveyBaseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

    Relational coordination suggests that effective coordination occurs through frequent, high-quality communication that is supported by relationships of shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect. Its measurement has been applied across several settings, including home care. Family caregivers and direct care workers will rate interactions with each other along three dimensions, with seven questions on a five-point scale related to the components of relational coordination. Four items related to communication include: frequency, timeliness, accuracy, and problem-solving. Three items measured relationships: shared knowledge, goals, and respect for each other. The mean of each of the seven items is calculated for each group (family caregivers and direct care workers). The total score for all items ranges from 7 to 35 where higher scores indicate better coordination and communication among family caregiver and direct care worker.

  • Direct Care Worker Job Satisfaction assessed by survey questionBaseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

    Job satisfaction measures the direct care worker's overall job satisfaction on a scale from 1-4 (1= Very dissatisfied, 2=Dissatisfied, 3=Satisfied, 4=Very Satisfied). Higher score is better.

  • Number of participants with new Direct Care Worker2 weeks and 4 weeks

    Direct Care Worker Turnover measure changes in the enrolled direct care worker participant in the study from the time baseline is completed to study endpoint at 4 weeks. Caregivers will be asked if the direct care worker left and at what time point in the study, and if the participant was assigned or hired a new worker. This will be measured using affirmative responses (yes or no).