Home Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Bladder in Spinal Cord Injury
This study is testing a device called iTNS (transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation) to see if it's safe and effective for managing neurogenic bladder (bladder problems due to nerve damage) in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). You might be able to join if you are 18-75 years old, have a chronic SCI above T9, and your bladder medications are stable. The study will look at how safe the iTNS device is by tracking any side effects, and how well it works by checking if toe flexion (bending your toes) can be achieved during stimulation. The study plans to enroll 21 participants, but its current status is unclear.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study planning to enroll 21 participants. It compares active iTNS to a sham iTNS device, which mimics the real treatment.
- What's involved
- The iTNS device will be applied continuously for 30 minutes, five times a week. The study will assess safety, accuracy, and reliability from baseline to 8 weeks.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be followed for safety, accuracy, and reliability from baseline to 8 weeks.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Home Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Bladder Management in Spinal Cord Injury
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Argyrios Stampas, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Safety as assessed by the number of device-related adverse eventsFrom baseline to 8 weeks
Adverse events include lead migration and fracture, hematoma, wound infection, delayed healing, nerve injury, and autonomic dysreflexia occurrence during the procedure.
- Accuracy as assessed by the percentage of sessions where toe flexion was achieved as recorded in subject logs.From baseline to week 8
- Reliability as assessed by the average minimum current (mA) required to elicit toe flexion when testing for accuracyFrom baseline to week 8
- Feasibility of Injectrode procedure as assessed by surveysWeek 8
Feasibility to check if reproducible training pathway can enable non-interventional physicians to competently perform Injectrode implantation and removal
- Physician acceptability of Injectrode device as assessed by a surveyWeek 8
The acceptability survey ranges from 0 - 32, with a higher score indicating greater acceptability of the Injectrode device.
- Participant acceptability of Injectrode device as assessed by a surveyWeek 8
The acceptability survey ranges from 0 - 25, with a higher score indicating greater acceptability of the Injectrode device.
- Feasibility and acceptability of the Injectrode treatment as assessed by a qualitative interviewWeek 8
A semi-structured interview will be conducted with participants and providers to explore their perceptions of the Injectrode treatment. Responses will be summarized using qualitative coding and descriptive statistics of themes.