TRIFECTA Trial: Adding Nadofaragene Firadenovec to Standard Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
This study is looking at a new way to treat muscle-invasive bladder cancer. It combines standard treatments (gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab) with a new treatment called nadofaragene firadenovec before surgery (radical cystectomy). Nadofaragene firadenovec is a gene therapy given directly into the bladder. The study wants to see if adding nadofaragene firadenovec is safe and can improve how well the treatment works for patients with bladder cancer that has grown into the muscle. You may be able to join if you are at least 18 years old and have muscle-invasive bladder cancer that you plan to have surgically removed. The study will measure success by looking at how much the cancer shrinks or disappears by the time of surgery. This study plans to enroll 33 participants, but its current recruitment status is unclear.
- Study design
- This is a phase II interventional study. It plans to enroll 33 participants.
- What's involved
- You would receive intravenous (IV) durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin, plus nadofaragene firadenovec directly into your bladder. These treatments repeat every 21 days for up to 4 cycles, followed by surgery. You will also have urine and blood tests, and imaging scans like CT, MRI, or PET/CT.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- After surgery, you will be followed for up to 30 days to check for any side effects.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Neoadjuvant Intravesical Nadofaragene Firadenovec With Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Durvalumab for the Treatment of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer, TRIFECTA Trial
At a glance
Conditions
NCT07332351
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washingtonstudy coordinator listed
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Jonathan Wright, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Pathological complete response (pCR) on radical cystectomy (RC) specimenAt time of radical cystectomy (RC), approximately 4-8 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapies
Will be defined as the proportion of participants achieving ypT0N0. Will employ Simon's optimal two-stage design (Simon, 1989) to test the null hypothesis that the true pCR rate is 33.8% versus the alternative hypothesis of 56%. The observed pCR rate will be reported with an exact 95% confidence interval using the Clopper-Pearson method.
- Downstaging (≤ ypT1N0) on RC specimenAt time of radical cystectomy (RC), approximately 4-8 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapies