NCT07401563

Community Mobility Plans: Improving Community Participation Through Travel Interventions for Adolescents and Young Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Enrolling by Invitation
NAAges 16–30InterventionalTreatment
Temple University
~60 participants
Updated 2026-02-10 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Community Mobility Planning Process (CMPP)

At a glance

Recruiting sites
0 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Community Mobility Experience
Measured over Pre-test, 1 month Post-test
+2 more outcomes measured
Intellectual and Developmental Disability
1 sites across 1 states
Florida1
  • Beth Pfeiffer, PhD, OTR/L, BCP, FAOTA · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Temple University
  • Jessica Kramer, PhD, OTR/L · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Florida

This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Part of the program/classroom where professional plans to implement the Community Mobility Planning Process.
16-30 at start of implementation.
Mild to moderate intellectual disability.
Can participate in program activities in English.

Exclusion

Plan to end/stop participation in the current organization in \<9 months from time of enrollment.
A developmental disability without an intellectual disability
Participants considered legally blind or deaf will be excluded to ensure a more homogeneous group for the initial development process
  • Community Mobility ExperiencePre-test, 1 month Post-test

    This survey assesses how often and how easily individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) leave home to participate in daily activities. It includes questions on transportation use, satisfaction, ease of access, and barriers or supports to community mobility. Responses help inform transportation needs and evaluate mobility-related interventions. The Community Mobility Experience Survey includes four scoring domains: frequency of community mobility (1-5), ease of mobility (1-4), sufficiency of mobility (0-2), and satisfaction with mobility (1-4). Higher scores indicate greater frequency, ease, sufficiency, or satisfaction with community mobility. In addition, specific transportation modes are evaluated across the same four domains-frequency, ease, sufficiency, and satisfaction-using the same scoring scales.

  • Community Mobility Self-EfficacyPre-test, 1 month Post-test

    This brief self-report measure assesses an individual's confidence in completing key steps related to community mobility and transportation planning. The scale responses are informed by standards outline by Bandura's self-efficacy theory, and items are modified from the general self-efficacy scale. Scores range from 20 to 60, with higher scores indicating a greater feeling of self-efficacy with community mobility.

  • PROMIS Satisfaction with Participation and Discretionary Social ActivitiesPre-test, 1 month Post-test

    This brief PROM, available from PROMIS, evaluates satisfaction with level of involvement in leisure activities. Scores range from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction with social roles and activities.