OsseoFit Stemless Shoulder System for Shoulder Injuries and Arthritis
This study is looking at the OsseoFit Stemless Shoulder System (Anatomic) to see how safe and effective it is for people with shoulder problems like injuries, pain, fractures, or arthritis. This system uses special implants, either the OsseoFit Stemless Inlay (which sits inside the bone) or the OsseoFit Stemless Onlay (which sits on top of the bone). Researchers want to understand how well these implants work, if there are any problems during or after surgery, and how they affect your shoulder function and quality of life. The main goal is to see how much your shoulder pain and function improve after two years. About 136 people are expected to join this study.
- Study design
- This is an observational study, meaning researchers will watch and collect information about your experience with the OsseoFit Stemless Shoulder System. It plans to enroll about 136 participants.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- You will be followed for at least two years to assess your shoulder function and pain, and for up to 10 years to track the implant's survival.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
OsseoFit Stemless Shoulder System (Anatomic)
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
2 sites across 2 statesStudy leadership
- Jim Nevelos · STUDY_DIRECTOR · Zimmer Biomet
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score2 years
The primary endpoint is the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score. Improvement from baseline to 2 years will be evaluated using the overall mean change, with effectiveness demonstrated if the mean improvement exceeds the MCID of 10.8 points. The primary endpoint analysis will use the ITT population with all available data and no imputation. Hypotheses: H0: μCFB ≤ 10.8; H1: μCFB \> 10.8, where μCFB is the mean ASES change (2 years minus baseline). The MCID of 10.8 was established using the 0.5 SD distribution method based on psychometric evaluation of ASES scores from 3,667 shoulder arthroplasty patients with ≥2-year follow-up.