Standardizing Swallow Pressure Measurements

This study is comparing two different medical devices, the Laborie LMT Pharyngeal System and the Medtronic ManoScan ESO HRM System, which are used to measure swallowing pressure. Researchers want to see how differences in these devices, like the size of their catheters (thin tubes), affect the measurements. The goal is to understand if these devices give similar results when measuring how well people swallow. You could be eligible if you are between 18 and 99 years old and do not have any known swallowing problems. The study is looking for 25 healthy adults and is currently unclear about its recruitment status.

Study design
This is an interventional study involving 25 healthy adult volunteers. It directly compares two different medical devices in the same setting.
What's involved
You would participate in a single study visit lasting up to 2 hours. During this visit, swallowing pressure measurements will be taken.
Compensation
Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up
Data will be collected during your single study visit. The study will be open for data collection for one year and data analysis for two years.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

NCT07475091

Standardizing Swallow Pressure Measurements

Not Yet Recruiting
NAAges 18–99InterventionalDiagnostic
University of Wisconsin, Madison
~25 participants
Updated 2026-08-28 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Laborie LMT Pharyngeal System (3.7 mm catheter)Medtronic ManoScan ESO HRM System (4.2 mm catheter)

At a glance

Recruiting sites
0 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Base of tongue pressure
Measured over data collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)
+14 more outcomes measured
Dysphagia
1 sites across 1 states
Wisconsin1
  • Timothy McCulloch, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Wisconsin, Madison

Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

without known swallowing disorders

Exclusion

Known swallowing disorder
Allergy to topical anesthetic
Allergy to food relevant to study participation (e.g. lactose intolerance)
Inability to follow direction or remain calm during the experiment.
  • Base of tongue pressuredata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • Hypopharyngeal peak pressuredata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • Pharyngeal Contractile Integral (PhCI)data collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • Pressure rise timedata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • Contractile front velocitydata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) resting pressuredata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • UES peak contraction pressuredata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • UES relaxation nadir pressuredata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • UES relaxation durationdata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • Nadir impedancedata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • Bolus presence timedata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • Flow intervaldata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • Pressure-flow index componentdata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • Timing relationships (onset-to-peak intervals)data collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Measured with both Laborie HRM impedance system and Medtronic HRM impedance system for comparison.

  • Construction of Spatial pressure distribution mapsdata collected during 1 study visit (up to 2 hours)

    Multi-level modeling for repeated measures across bolus types, volumes, and repetitions. Sensor-level and region-level analyses (BOT, hypopharynx, UES). Agreement thresholds and bias definitions added to facilitate interpretability and ensure clarity for cross-platform comparison. Map layers will be summarized as a proxy for this measure.