Redesigning Surgical Care for Patients in Wisconsin
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
2 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Margaret (Gretchen) L Schwarze, MD, MPP · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · UW School of Medicine and Public Health
Who to contact
This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Percentage of surgeons trained to competenceAt completion of the assessment phase (after 10 training recordings and 5 assessment recordings per surgeon), approximately 3-12 months
Competence is assessed using the established 10-item adherence checklist, yielding a total possible score ranging from 0 to 10, applied to the five assessment audio recordings obtained after each surgeon completes the 10 training recordings. Higher scores indicate greater fidelity to the Better Conversations framework, competence is 6 or higher. The performance of surgeons in the automated-training group will be compared with those in the education-specialist training group, and non-inferiority will be evaluated using a 5% non-inferiority margin. Feasibility is defined as greater than or equal to 80 percent of surgeons trained to competence.