Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive and Motor Deficits in Parkinson's Disease
This study is testing if transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can help improve verbal retrieval (how easily you can find words), thinking abilities, and movement control in people with Parkinson's disease. Researchers will compare active tDCS to sham tDCS (a non-active version) using a device called Neuroelectrics Starstim tES. They will look at how well participants can retrieve words and other cognitive and motor skills after treatment. You may be able to join if you are 50-90 years old, have Parkinson's disease, and experience difficulty with verbal fluency, as shown by specific neuropsychological tests. The study plans to enroll 20 participants.
- Study design
- This study is an interventional trial planning to enroll 20 participants. It compares active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to a sham (inactive) tDCS treatment.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be followed for changes in verbal fluency at 1 week and 2 months after treatment.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Treatment of Cognitive and Sensorimotor Deficits in Parkinson's Disease With High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
At a glance
Conditions
NCT07534397
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Callier Clinical Center, The University of Texas at Dallas
Richardson, Texasstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- John Hart, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Callier Clinical Research Center, The University of Texas at Dallas
- Saul A Frankford, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Callier Clinical Research Center, The University of Texas at Dallas
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment on Category FluencyOutcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment
valuation of treatment group differences in change on Category Fluency from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: Number of Correct Items Generated (minimum=0 words; no maximum)
- Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment on Category FluencyOutcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: Change from baseline to 2-month Post-Treatment
Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on Category Fluency from baseline to 2-months post-treatment. Metric: Number of Correct Items Generated (minimum=0 words; no maximum)
- Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment on Phonemic FluencyOutcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 6 weeks: Change from baseline to 1-week Post-Treatment
Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on Phonemic Fluency from baseline to 1-week post-treatment. Metric: Number of Correct Items Generated (minimum=0 words; no maximum)
- Treatment group differences in change from Baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment on Phonemic FluencyOutcome measures will be assessed as change over a period of 13 weeks: Change from baseline to 2-months Post-Treatment
Evaluation of treatment group differences in change on Phonemic Fluency from baseline to 2-months post-treatment. Metric: Number of Correct Items Generated (minimum=0 words; no maximum)