NCT07565584

Examining Migration, Social Bonds, Transnationalism, and HIV Prevention Pathways Among African Immigrants.

Not Yet Recruiting
NAAges 18–50InterventionalPrevention
State University of New York at Buffalo
~144 participants
Updated 2026-06-29 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Relationship-Centered HIV Prevention Intervention Component (Proof-of-Concept)

At a glance

Recruiting sites
0 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Acceptability of Intervention - AIM Score and 75% Acceptability Threshold
Measured over Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure
+2 more outcomes measured
HIV Prevention
HIV Testing
Sexual and Reproductive Health
1 sites across 1 states
New York1
  • Gloria A. Aidoo-Frimpong, PhD, MPH, MA · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · State University of New York at Buffalo
Gloria A. Aidoo-Frimpong, PhD, MPH, MA
Email the study team

Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Age 18 to 50 years at the time of enrollment
Self-identify as a first-generation African immigrant (born in an African country and currently residing in the United States)
Currently reside in New York or Massachusetts
Able to communicate in English at approximately a 3rd-grade reading level
Have access to a smartphone or computer with internet capability sufficient to participate in Zoom and/or WhatsApp-based study activities
Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion

Are under 18 years of age
Do not self-identify as a first-generation African immigrant
Do not reside in New York or Massachusetts
Are unable to provide informed consent
Do not have access to the technology required for virtual participation (Zoom and/or WhatsApp)
  • Acceptability of Intervention - AIM Score and 75% Acceptability ThresholdImmediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure

    Acceptability measured using the validated 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). Scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Results will be reported as mean and standard deviation. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability (better outcome). In addition, the intervention will be considered acceptable if: (1) at least 75% of participants rate it as acceptable or very acceptable, and (2) at least 75% rate it as culturally relevant. Unit of Measure: Mean AIM score (1-5 scale)

  • Feasibility of Intervention - FIM ScoreImmediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure

    Feasibility of the intervention will be measured using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), a validated 4-item scale with 5-point Likert responses. Scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Results will be reported as mean and standard deviation. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility (better outcome). Unit of Measure: Mean FIM score (1-5 scale)

  • Appropriateness of Intervention - IAM ScoreImmediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure

    Appropriateness of the intervention will be measured using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), a validated 4-item scale with 5-point Likert responses. Scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Results will be reported as mean and standard deviation. Higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness (better outcome). Unit of Measure: Mean IAM score (1-5 scale)