Micropractices for Unhoused LGBTQ Youth
This study is testing a new approach called "Micropractices for Unhoused LGBTQ Youth" to help young people who identify as LGBTQ and are experiencing homelessness. It's looking at whether brief daily activities, either focusing on mindfulness and identity or neutral reflections, can improve well-being and reduce mental health symptoms and substance use. You can join if you are 16-26 years old, identify as LGBTQ, have recently experienced housing instability, and have a mobile device with internet. The study will measure if these practices are acceptable and helpful. The current status of this study is unclear.
- Study design
- This is a pilot randomized controlled trial with 200 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one receiving mindfulness and identity-based micropractices, and the other receiving neutral control micropractices.
- What's involved
- You will complete a brief daily activity (about 1-5 minutes) for 30 days. You will also complete assessments at the end of the 30 days and again three months later.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be followed for three months after the intervention period.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Micropractices for Unhoused LGBTQ Youth
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesWho to contact
This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure [AIM])Assessed at post-intervention (30 days) and 3-month follow-up.
Assessed using four items measuring participant-reported implementation outcome items evaluating approval, liking, and overall acceptance of the assigned activity. Responses are given on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
- Appropriateness (Intervention Appropriateness Measure [IAM])Assessed at post-intervention (30 days) and 3-month follow-up.
Assessed using four items measuring participant-reported implementation outcome items evaluating whether the assigned activity seems relevant, fitting, and compatible with participants' lives. Responses are given on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
- Feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure [FIM])Assessed at post-intervention (30 days) and 3-month follow-up.
Assessed using four items measuring participant-reported implementation outcome items evaluating whether the assigned activity seems workable, possible, and easy to do in daily life. Responses are given on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
- Intervention adherenceAssessed daily during the 30-day intervention period.
Assessed by self-reported completion of the assigned daily activity during the 30-day intervention period. Higher adherence indicates a better outcome.