Study on Low-Tech Communication for Autism and Neurodevelopmental Conditions
This study is looking at better ways to help children with autism or other neurodevelopmental conditions communicate, especially those who don't speak much or at all. It compares two approaches: "Automated AAC Assessment and Low-Tech AAC Implementation Support" and "Standard AAC Support." The first uses a computer to figure out a child's communication needs and suggest personalized low-tech tools like picture boards. The second provides usual care for communication support. We want to see if these methods improve how well children communicate and how consistently these tools are used. We are looking for 500 children aged 3 to 14 who have autism or a related condition, are minimally verbal or non-verbal, and have a caregiver who can communicate in English.
- Study design
- This interventional study plans to enroll 500 participants. It compares two different approaches to supporting communication.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants' functional communication will be measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. AAC implementation fidelity will be measured from baseline to the end of the intervention (about 12 weeks).
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Reciprocal Innovation to Optimize Low-Tech Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) for Individuals
At a glance
Conditions
NCT07581483
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 2 sites. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital
Eldoret, Kenyastudy coordinator listed
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginiastudy coordinator listed
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Eren Oyungu, MBChB · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Moi University
- Megan S. McHenry, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Indiana University
- Mandy Rispoli, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Virginia
- Jim Solan, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Virginia
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Functional CommunicationBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Change in child functional communication, measured by the Communication Matrix total score. The Communication Matrix assesses intentional communication behaviors across communication functions and modalities.
- AAC Implementation FidelityBaseline to end of intervention (approximately 12 weeks)
Fidelity of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) implementation by communication partners, measured using a standardized AAC fidelity checklist based on recommended system use and communication strategies.