FOCUS Bipolar: Understanding Bipolar Disorder Risk in Families
This study, called FOCUS Bipolar, is looking at ways to help families understand the risk of bipolar disorder (a mental health condition causing extreme mood swings) in children and teenagers. It's an observational study, meaning researchers will watch and learn, not give new treatments. They are testing a family-centered approach to screening youth aged 7-21 who have a biological parent with bipolar disorder. The study will involve creating and testing a video and FAQ document to help parents make informed decisions about screening. Researchers want to see if these tools help parents understand genetic risk and if remote screening for youth is practical and accepted. They also want to identify early risk patterns. About 200 people are expected to join. The study is currently unclear on its recruitment status.
- Study design
- This is an observational study involving approximately 200 participants. It includes co-design workshops and testing of decision aid prototypes.
- What's involved
- You might participate in workshops to help design educational materials, or provide feedback on video and FAQ documents. Youth participants will take screening surveys.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The study measures outcomes like decision aid acceptability and usability, and youth screening uptake rate, at 16 months.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
FOCUS Bipolar: Families Opening Conversations for Understanding Signs
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Karabi Nandy, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
What this trial measures
- Decision Aid Acceptability Score16 Months
Mean participant rating of decision aid acceptability using study-specific Likert-type items assessing clarity, balance, trustworthiness, and usefulness. Items are rated from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating strongly disagree and 5 indicating strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
- Decision Aid Usability Score16 Months
Description: Mean participant rating of decision aid usability using study-specific Likert-type items assessing ease of navigation, visual clarity, and overall satisfaction. Items are rated from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating strongly disagree and 5 indicating strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater usability.
- Youth Screening Uptake Rate16 Months
Percentage of eligible caregivers who consent for youth mental health screening after participation in the decision-aid workflow.
- Youth Screening Completion Rate16 Months
Percentage of youth participants who complete the assigned remote mental health screening battery after consent or permission and assent, as applicable.