Back to search results
NCT07644702

WE-CARE Community Health Forums to Increase Breast Cancer Screening and Clinical Trial Participation for Rural and Low Income Women

Recruiting
NAAges 50–74InterventionalHealth services
Mayo Clinic
~50 participants
Updated 2026-06-12 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Educational InterventionPatient NavigationSupportive Care

At a glance

Recruiting sites
1 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Recruitment yield
Measured over At time of forum
+8 more outcomes measured

Conditions

Breast Carcinoma

Explore related trials

Breast Carcinoma

Where it's being run

1 sites across 1 states
Wisconsin1

Study leadership

  • Pravesh Sharma, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Clinic

Who to contact

Pravesh Sharma, MD
[email protected]
715-838-5369
Email the study team

Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Female
Be between the ages of 50 and 74 years
Have no prior history of breast cancer screening (i.e., who have either never received a mammogram or have not had one in the past five years)
Reside in a rural community in Wisconsin or belong to low income (self-reported)
Be able to speak and understand English or Spanish
Be willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion

Women who have received a mammogram within the past five years
Have a current or prior diagnosis of breast cancer
Are currently undergoing treatment for any active malignancy
Have cognitive or psychiatric impairments that, in the judgment of the study team, would preclude meaningful participation

What this trial measures

  • Recruitment yieldAt time of forum

    Assessed via the number enrolled divided by the number of eligible participants approached.

  • Exposure reach (community level reach)At time of forum

    Assessed by the number of attendees divided by the estimated number of population indirectly exposed (e.g., via flyers, social media, community announcements).

  • RetentionFrom baseline to 3 months

    Assessed by the number of participants who complete 3-month follow-up.

  • Perceived participant satisfactionImmediately following completion of forum

    Success is defined as ≥ 75% of participants rating the experience ≥ 4 on a 5-point scale rated on a 5-point scale where 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater perceived satisfaction.

  • Perceived barriers to engagement and community impactImmediately following completion of forum

    Assessed by post-intervention focus groups and brief qualitative interviews. Results will be analyzed descriptively.

  • Perceived facilitators to engagement and community impactImmediately following completion of forum

    Assessed by post-intervention focus groups and brief qualitative interviews. Results will be analyzed descriptively.

  • Perceived acceptability - AIMImmediately following completion of forum

    Assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), which consists of 4 items (e.g., meets my approval, is appealing to me) each rated on a 5-point scale where 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability.

  • Perceived appropriateness - IAMImmediately following completion of forum

    Assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), which consists of 4 items (e.g., seems fitting, seems like a good match) each rated on a 5-point scale where 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree.

  • Perceived feasibility - FIMImmediately following completion of forum

    Assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), which consists of 4 items (e.g., seems implementable, seems easy to use) each rated on a 5-point scale where 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability.