NCT07703501

Advancing North Shore Community Health Through Ocean-raised and faRm-grown Foods (ANCHOR Study)

Active, Not Recruiting
NAAges 18+InterventionalPrevention
Tufts University
~50 participants
Updated 2026-07-20 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Medically supportive meal kits

At a glance

Recruiting sites
0 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Feasibility and Acceptability of Medically Supportive Meal Kit Program
Measured over From enrollment to the end of the study (end of 12-weeks)
Diet Quality
Prevention
1 sites across 1 states
Massachusetts1
  • Kelseanna Hollis-Hansen, PhD, MPH · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Tufts University

This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Be 18 years of age or older
Be a client of The Open Door food pantry in Gloucester, MA
Be able to provide informed consent

Exclusion

Under age 18
Unable to provide informed consent
Have a food allergy, medical condition, or dietary restriction that makes it unsafe to eat the study foods (e.g., seafood or milk allergy, liquid diet)
Another member of the same household is already participating (only one participant per household)
Planning to move out of the area within the next 4 months
Previously participated in a healthy meal kit program at The Open Door
Do not have reliable transportation to pick up meal kits
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of Medically Supportive Meal Kit ProgramFrom enrollment to the end of the study (end of 12-weeks)

    The primary outcome assesses whether providing meal kits with locally sourced seafood and produce through a food pantry is practical and well-received. This includes measures such as participation and retention rates, adherence to receiving meal kits, and participant feedback on satisfaction, ease of use, and cultural relevance of the meal kits and materials.