PST-Aid for Depression in Community Health Centers
This study is looking at ways to improve how Problem-Solving Treatment (PST) is used in community health centers for people with depression. PST is a skills-based approach that teaches a 7-step method to tackle problems. The study compares the usual way PST is taught to practitioners with a new internet-based tool called PST-Aid. PST-Aid helps practitioners deliver PST by providing support and tools like patient problem lists. The researchers want to see if PST-Aid helps practitioners use PST more effectively and if it leads to better outcomes for patients with depression. You might be able to join if you are a practitioner (social worker, psychologist, counselor, or similar) working in an OCHIN clinical network clinic and provide mental health care. The study aims to enroll 410 participants, but its current status is unclear.
- Study design
- This is a randomized clinical trial comparing two ways of delivering Problem-Solving Treatment (PST): the usual method and PST-Aid. The study plans to enroll 410 participants.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The study measures changes in practitioner usability, responsiveness, and appropriateness at the start, 3 months, and 6 months.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Implementation of Problem-Solving Treatment in Community Health Centers (PST-Aid)
At a glance
Conditions
NCT06494384
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
OCHIN, Inc.
Portland, Oregonstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Patrick Raue, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Washington
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Change in Implementation Strategy Usability Scale (ISUS) scoreBaseline, 3 months, 6 months
Usability will be evaluated with clinician report on the 10-item Implementation Strategy Usability Scale (ISUS), which is based closely on the well-validated System Usability Scale. Ratings are on a 1 to 5 scale and yield a total score from 0 to 100. Half the items are reverse scored; higher total scores reflect greater usability. The ISUS has good inter-item consistency (a = .83) and sensitivity. Research has also demonstrated that the original version of the ISUS (the SUS) functions similarly-and yields similar scores-for adults and youth as young as 11 years.
- Change in Participant Responsiveness Scale (PRS) scoreBaseline, 3 months, 6 months
Clinicians will complete the Participant Responsiveness Scale (PRS), an adapted version of the 12-item Patient Responsiveness Scale tailored to be developmentally appropriate for children aged 8 and above as well as adults. The PRS measures two factors, Participation and Enthusiasm. The original Patient Responsiveness Scale has demonstrated strong reliability (a = .86) and construct validity.
- Change in Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) scoreBaseline, 3 months, 6 months
Clinicians will complete the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) is a rigorously developed, pragmatic instrument with strong good internal consistency (a = .87) and test-retest reliability (a = .87).
- Adoption over timeBaseline, 7 months post-initial training in the intervention, and end of the individual's study participation period, assessed as the study withdrawal date or 24 months post-training, whichever is first
Adoption is operationalized as whether or not the clinician completes at least 1 PST session with 3 or more cases at any point during study participation.
- Reach over timeBaseline, 7 months post-initial training in the intervention, and end of the individual's study participation period, assessed as the study withdrawal date or 24 months post-training, whichever is first
Reach will be calculated as the percentage of clinicians caseloads of patients with a depressive disorder receiving PST.
- Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scoreBaseline, 4 weeks, 9 weeks
The Patient Health Questionnaire is one of the most used short depression measures. The PHQ features 9 items on a four-point scale (0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day), with cutpoints for 5, 10, 15, and 20 representing mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe levels of depressive symptoms. Four original validation studies were conducted on nearly 10,000 patients, and there have been multiple meta-analyses. Scores have been found valid, with sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 88% for a cut point of 10 has been found for Major Depressive Disorders.
- Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-169 weeks
This measure will ask 3 items from the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-16: Did treatment meet your needs? Are you satisfied with treatment services? Would you use the same treatment again if needed?
- Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders Social Relations scale (Neuro-QOL) scoreBaseline, 4 weeks, 9 weeks
The Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders Satisfaction with Social Roles scale (Neuro-QOL) is a widely used 8-item measure of functioning in usual social roles, activities, and responsibilities. Factor analyses and Item Response Theory analyses have ensured broad information parameters without differential item functioning by demographics. Scale scores have been validated and normed on thousands of participants in the US general and clinical inpatient and outpatient settings, presenting with a variety of problem areas. Scores provide a T score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, aligned with a variety of norming samples. An example item stem is: In the past 7 days I am able to do all of my regular family activities. Response options are on a scale of 1 to 5 (1=never, 2-rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always).
- Initial fidelity (PST Fidelity Scale)Expert clinicians review audiotapes of therapy sessions or mock interview for each clinician participant over a six-month period of time prior to certification in the intervention
Fidelity will be measured using the PST Adherence and Competency Scale (PST Fidelity Scale). The PST Fidelity Scale includes seven items assessing the seven key problem-solving steps rated on a 5 point scale (0=very poor, 5=very good), an average score of 3 or greater indicates a satisfactory performance.Internal consistency is good, with Cronbach alpha ranging from .83 to .89. A Principal Components Analysis found all factors loaded on a common factor accounting for 76.6% of the variance.Interrater reliability has been found to be high (r=.822-.918), with 86% of two-rater comparisons within one point of each other. Initial fidelity will be defined as the hours of training until fidelity-based certification is reached, measured by trainer PST Fidelity Scale ratings of session recordings or mock interviews.
- Sustained fidelityExpert clinicians review audiotapes of therapy sessions or mock interview for each clinician participant over a six-month period of time after initial training
Sustained fidelity will be rated via observer coding of recordings of one randomly selected session (or mock interview) per client using the PST Fidelity Scale (i.e., fidelity tool)