Teachers Leading the Front Lines - North Carolina (Tealeaf-NC) Study
This study, called Tealeaf-NC, is looking at new ways to help children with mental health concerns like depression and anxiety. It's testing two programs: "Teachers Leading the Frontlines" (Tealeaf) and "Responding to Students' Emotions Through Education" (RE-SEED). Both programs train teachers to recognize and support students with mental health needs. The Tealeaf program involves a 3-day training and supervision from the study team, while RE-SEED has a shorter 1-day training and supervision only from school counselors. The study wants to see how well these programs are accepted, how appropriate they are, and how easy they are to put into practice in schools. It also aims to see if they can help improve children's mental health. Schools in North Carolina with eligible principals and teachers can participate. The study is currently unclear on its recruitment status.
- Study design
- This interventional study plans to enroll about 312 participants. It is designed to compare two different teacher training programs.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The study measures outcomes at the start (Month 0) and after 9 months.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Teachers Leading the Front Lines - North Carolina (Tealeaf-NC)
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Christina R Cruz, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
What this trial measures
- Mean Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) ScoresMonth 0, Month 9
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) measures the stakeholder's beliefs about the acceptability of the assigned intervention. Each element is scored from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely agree). Mean scores are calculated, with a higher score indicating that the teacher believes the intervention is more acceptable, and a score greater than or equal to 4 indicating positive acceptability.
- Mean Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) ScoresMonth 0, Month 9
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) measures the stakeholder's beliefs about the appropriateness of the assigned intervention. Each element is scored from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely Agree). Mean scores are calculated, with a higher score indicating that the teacher believes the intervention is more appropriate, and a score greater than or equal to 4 indicating the intervention is more appropriate.
- Mean Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) ScoresMonth 0, Month 9
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) measured the stakeholder's beliefs about the feasibility of the assigned intervention. Each element is scored from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely agree). Mean scores are calculated, with a higher score indicating that the teacher believes the intervention is more feasible, and a score greater than or equal to 4 indicating positive feasibility.
- Mean Cause Analysis Chart (AABC) Evaluation Checklist ScoresMonth 9
The Cause Analysis Chart (AABC) Evaluation Checklist is a study-specific tool that assists evaluators in scoring the fidelity with which teachers accurately complete the AABC Chart. Mean scores are calculated and can range from 1 (Needs improvement) to 5 (Advanced) with a higher mean score indicating higher fidelity, and an overall mean score greater than or equal to 4 indicating sufficient fidelity.
- Mean 4Cs Behavior Plan Evaluation Checklist ScoresMonth 9
The 4Cs Behavior Plan Evaluation Checklist is a study-specific tool that assists evaluators in scoring the fidelity with which teachers accurately complete the 4Cs Behavior Plan. Mean scores are calculated and can range from 1 (Needs improvement) to 5 (Advanced) with a higher mean score indicating higher fidelity, and an overall mean score greater than or equal to 4 indicating sufficient fidelity.
- Mean One-on-One Student Interaction Evaluation Tool ScoresMonth 9
The One-on-One Student Interaction Evaluation Tool is a study-specific tool that measures the fidelity with which teachers conduct one-on-one sessions with the student(s). Teachers are rated on six domains on a scale that ranges from 1 (Needs Improvement) to 5 (Advanced). Scores are averaged and rounded to a half point across domains to yield mean scores from 1 to 5 with a mean higher score indicating higher fidelity, and a mean score greater than or equal to 4 indicating sufficient fidelity.
- Mean One-on-One Family Interaction Evaluation Tool ScoresMonth 9
The One-on-One Family Interaction Evaluation Tool is a study-specific tool that measures the fidelity with which teachers conduct family interactions. Teachers are rated on six domains on a scale that ranges from 1 (Needs improvement) to 5 (Advanced). Scores are averaged and rounded to a half point across domains to yield mean scores from 1 to 5 with a mean higher score indicating higher fidelity, and a mean score greater than or equal to 4 indicating sufficient fidelity.